Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(5): 415-427, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402895

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management strategies and clinical outcomes vary substantially in patients newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease. We evaluated the use of a putative prognostic biomarker to guide therapy by assessing outcomes in patients randomised to either top-down (ie, early combined immunosuppression with infliximab and immunomodulator) or accelerated step-up (conventional) treatment strategies. METHODS: PROFILE (PRedicting Outcomes For Crohn's disease using a moLecular biomarker) was a multicentre, open-label, biomarker-stratified, randomised controlled trial that enrolled adults with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥7, either elevated C-reactive protein or faecal calprotectin or both, and endoscopic evidence of active inflammation). Potential participants had blood drawn to be tested for a prognostic biomarker derived from T-cell transcriptional signatures (PredictSURE-IBD assay). Following testing, patients were randomly assigned, via a secure online platform, to top-down or accelerated step-up treatment stratified by biomarker subgroup (IBDhi or IBDlo), endoscopic inflammation (mild, moderate, or severe), and extent (colonic or other). Blinding to biomarker status was maintained throughout the trial. The primary endpoint was sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission to week 48. Remission was defined by a composite of symptoms and inflammatory markers at all visits. Flare required active symptoms (HBI ≥5) plus raised inflammatory markers (CRP >upper limit of normal or faecal calprotectin ≥200 µg/g, or both), while remission was the converse-ie, quiescent symptoms (HBI <5) or resolved inflammatory markers (both CRP ≤ the upper limit of normal and calprotectin <200 µg/g) or both. Analyses were done in the full analysis (intention-to-treat) population. The trial has completed and is registered (ISRCTN11808228). FINDINGS: Between Dec 29, 2017, and Jan 5, 2022, 386 patients (mean age 33·6 years [SD 13·2]; 179 [46%] female, 207 [54%] male) were randomised: 193 to the top-down group and 193 to the accelerated step-up group. Median time from diagnosis to trial enrolment was 12 days (range 0-191). Primary outcome data were available for 379 participants (189 in the top-down group; 190 in the accelerated step-up group). There was no biomarker-treatment interaction effect (absolute difference 1 percentage points, 95% CI -15 to 15; p=0·944). Sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission was significantly more frequent in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (149 [79%] of 189 patients vs 29 [15%] of 190 patients, absolute difference 64 percentage points, 95% CI 57 to 72; p<0·0001). There were fewer adverse events (including disease flares) and serious adverse events in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (adverse events: 168 vs 315; serious adverse events: 15 vs 42), with fewer complications requiring abdominal surgery (one vs ten) and no difference in serious infections (three vs eight). INTERPRETATION: Top-down treatment with combination infliximab plus immunomodulator achieved substantially better outcomes at 1 year than accelerated step-up treatment. The biomarker did not show clinical utility. Top-down treatment should be considered standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease. FUNDING: Wellcome and PredictImmune Ltd.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Inflamação , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário
2.
SSM Popul Health ; 24: 101541, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38021462

RESUMO

Objective: Worse neighborhood socioeconomic environment (NSEE) may contribute to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We examined whether the relationship between NSEE and T2D differs by sex and age in three study populations. Research design and methods: We conducted a harmonized analysis using data from three independent longitudinal study samples in the US: 1) the Veteran Administration Diabetes Risk (VADR) cohort, 2) the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort, and 3) a case-control study of Geisinger electronic health records in Pennsylvania. We measured NSEE with a z-score sum of six census tract indicators within strata of community type (higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural). Community type-stratified models evaluated the likelihood of new diagnoses of T2D in each study sample using restricted cubic splines and quartiles of NSEE. Results: Across study samples, worse NSEE was associated with higher risk of T2D. We observed significant effect modification by sex and age, though evidence of effect modification varied by site and community type. Largely, stronger associations between worse NSEE and diabetes risk were found among women relative to men and among those less than age 45 in the VADR cohort. Similar modification by age group results were observed in the Geisinger sample in small town/suburban communities only and similar modification by sex was observed in REGARDS in lower density urban communities. Conclusions: The impact of NSEE on T2D risk may differ for males and females and by age group within different community types.

3.
J Crohns Colitis ; 17(1): 103-110, 2023 Jan 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35948280

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients admitted to hospital with inflammatory bowel disease[IBD] are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism[VTE]. This study aims to identify IBD patients at increased VTE risk on hospital discharge and to develop a risk scoring system to recognise them. METHODS: Hospital episode statistics data were used to identify all patients admitted with IBD as an emergency or electively for surgery. All patients with VTE within 90 days of hospital discharge were identified. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to identify patient- and admission-level factors associated with VTE. A scoring system to identify patients at higher risk for VTE was constructed. RESULTS: A total of 201 779 admissions in 101 966 patients were included. The rate of VTE within 90 days was 17.2 per 1000 patient-years at risk and was highest in patients admitted as an emergency who underwent surgery[36.9]. VTE was associated with: female sex (odds ratio 0.65 [95% confidence interval 0.53-0.80], p <0.001); increasing age [49-60 years] (4.67 [3.36-6.49], p <0.001); increasing length of hospital stay [>10 days] (3.80 [2.80-5.15], p <0.001); more than two hospital admissions in previous 3 months (2.23 [1.60-3.10], p <0.001); ulcerative colitis (1.48 [1.21-1.82], p <0.001); and emergency admission including surgery (1.59 [1.12-2.27], p = 0.010); or emergency admission not including surgery (1.59 [1.08-2.35], p = 0.019) compared with elective surgery. A score >12 in the VTE scoring system gave a positive predictive value [PPV] of VTE of 1%. The area under the curve [AUC] was 0.714 [95% CI 0.70-0.73]. CONCLUSION: IBD patients admitted to hospital with a prolonged length of stay, increasing age, male sex, or as an emergency were at increased risk of VTE following discharge. Higher-risk patients were identifiable by a VTE risk scoring system.


Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Alta do Paciente , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/cirurgia , Hospitalização , Fatores de Risco , Hospitais
4.
Frontline Gastroenterol ; 13(2): 104-110, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35295752

RESUMO

Introduction: During COVID-19, the management of outpatient inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) changed from face-to-face (F2F) to telephone and video consultations across the UK. We surveyed patients with IBD and IBD healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the impact of this abrupt transition on patient and HCP satisfaction outcomes, including the barriers and enablers of this service. Methods: Patient satisfaction surveys were sent to patients who had a telephone consultation from May to July 2020. A second survey was sent to IBD HCPs across the UK. Questions from both surveys consisted of a mixture of multiple-choice options, ranking answers as well as short-answer questions. Results: 210 patients and 114 HCPs completed the survey. During COVID-19, there was a significantly greater use of telephone, video or a mixture of consultation. F2F consultations were consistently preferred by patients, with 50% of patients indicating they did not want the option of for video consultations. Patients were more likely to prefer a telephone consultation if they were stable and needed routine review. Significantly fewer HCPs (5.3%) intend to use F2F consultations alone, preferring the use of telephone (20.2%) or combinations of telephone/F2F (22.8%), telephone/video (4.4%) or combination of all three consultation types (34.2%). 63% indicated they intend to incorporate video consultations in the future. Conclusion: Telephone and video consultations need to be balanced proportionately with F2F clinics to achieve both patient and HCP satisfaction. Further research needs to be done to explore the use of video medicine in patients with IBD.

5.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(2): 457-462, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33721160

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: IBD, both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is associated with significant functional disability. Gastrointestinal symptoms alone are not the sole purpose of the interaction between patients and providers. In order to ascertain patients' disabilities, we utilized the recently developed IBD Disk to help determine their functional concerns and initiate relevant conversation. We aimed to ascertain patient acceptability and their major disabilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study, IBD patients at their outpatient visit were given the paper version of the IBD Disk. Patients were asked to score their level of disability for each item of the IBD Disk. The completed scores were then shared with their healthcare provider to act as a focus of discussion during the consultation. Patients and clinicians were also asked to provide informal qualitative feedback as to the benefits of the IBD Disk and areas for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 377 (female 60%) patients completed the questionnaires over the study period. Patient acceptability scored on a 0-10 Likert scale was excellent. All patients scored all domains of disability. Sleep, energy, and joint pain were the highest scoring domains of the IBD Disk, scoring higher than digestive symptoms. Clinicians and patients agreed that the IBD Disk allowed for ease of communication about disability symptoms and relevance to their day-to-day functioning. CONCLUSION: The IBD Disk is a novel easy-to-use tool to assess the functional disability of patients. We next plan to utilize it in the form of an electronic app internationally and in relation to treatment commencement and escalation.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Artralgia/fisiopatologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Fadiga/fisiopatologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/fisiopatologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gastroenterologistas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(11): 972-80, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21806954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Complications after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) have not been well characterized in large, population-based studies. We characterized postoperative in-hospital complications, stratified them by severity, and assessed independent clinical predictors, including use of immunosuppressants. METHODS: We performed population-based surveillance using administrative databases to identify all adults (≥18 y) who had an International Classification of Diseases-9th/10th revisions code for UC and a colectomy from 1996 to 2009. All medical charts were reviewed. The primary outcome was severe postoperative complications, including in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of complications after colectomy and then restricted to patients undergoing emergent or elective surgeries. RESULTS: Of the 666 UC patients who underwent a colectomy, a postoperative complication occurred in 27.0% and the mortality rate was 1.5%. Independent predictors of postoperative complications were age (for patients >64 vs 18-34 y: odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.54), comorbidities (>2 vs none: OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.06-3.37), and admission status (emergent vs elective colectomy: OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.14-2.30). Significant risk factors for an emergent colectomy included time from admission to colectomy (>14 vs 3-14 d: OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.62-6.80) and a preoperative complication (≥1 vs 0: OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.33-6.91). A prescription of immunosuppressants before colectomies did not increase the risk for postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications frequently occur after colectomy for UC, predominantly among elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Patients who were admitted to the hospital under emergency conditions and did not respond to medical treatment had worse outcomes when surgery was performed 14 or more days after admission.


Assuntos
Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
7.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 7(2): 93-101, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20134491

RESUMO

The introduction of biologic therapy for the treatment of IBD has substantially changed its management. The safety concerns associated with biologic therapies include the increased risk of infection, autoimmunity, development of lymphoma and demyelinating disease, and the risk of worsening heart failure. There are several strategies for minimizing the risks associated with biologic therapies. Pretreatment strategies include taking a proper history from the patient, physical examination of the patient, screening for latent tuberculosis and ruling out sepsis. Vaccination of patients against vaccine preventable diseases is also recommended. During treatment, patients should be closely monitored and any symptoms that develop should be dealt with early. Education of physicians and patients is also important to allow the early detection of any adverse events.


Assuntos
Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Educação Médica Continuada , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Infecções/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
8.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 24(2): 127-33, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20151072

RESUMO

5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) preparations (eg, mesalazine, mesalamine) are well-established preparations used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. These drugs are most useful for the treatment of mild to moderate flares of ulcerative colitis and, especially, for maintenance of remission. Although most gastroenterologists are very familiar with these drugs, the interest in these drugs has undergone a resurgence, with new preparations offering convenience and high dosage, while preserving their customary safety. New dosage regimens are likely to become standard practice in the near future. There is also considerable interest in chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in the context of inflammatory bowel disease, and the role of long-term maintenance therapy with 5-ASAs in achieving such chemoprevention. A mechanism of action for such chemoprevention has been provided by the agonism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma by 5-ASA, which unifies its efficacy as an anti-inflammatory and chemopreventive agent. In the future, even more effective agents based on 5-ASA are expected, based on more powerful agonism of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma; 5-ASA preparations have become 'trendy' again.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Mesalamina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacologia , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Humanos , Mesalamina/administração & dosagem , Mesalamina/farmacologia , PPAR gama/agonistas , Indução de Remissão , Comprimidos
9.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 11(6): 509-17, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19903428

RESUMO

Successful management of the patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involves not only the induction and maintenance of remission, but also the optimization of the benefit-to-risk equation to achieve the greatest gain in quality of life. These risks range from intolerance to prescribed medications to potentially life-threatening sequelae (eg, sepsis) of immune suppression. A proper awareness of risk on the part of the physician and education of the patient can lead to early detection and institution of an appropriate management plan, including risk management and, optimally, primary prevention (eg, prophylactic vaccination). One should take the opportunity regularly to reassess the utility and efficacy of existing therapy, with the provision of ineffective therapies mandating urgent review. Overall, optimal management of the patient with IBD requires open dialogue between clinician and patient so that both are cognizant of the goals, benefits, and potential risks of therapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Mesalamina/efeitos adversos , Mesalamina/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Riscos , Sulfassalazina/efeitos adversos , Sulfassalazina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...